Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Surgical Techniques in Common Abdominal Procedures

Main Article Content

Prasanna Vignesh Subramanian, Saaya Daevi G Ramesh, Rakesh Natesan, D Manjula, Vidhyagar K, Punithavathy C, Muthukumaran S

Abstract

Background
Surgical practices have undergone remarkable transformation over recent decades with the advent of minimally invasive techniques, particularly laparoscopic surgery. While open surgery has historically been the cornerstone of operative management, the adoption of laparoscopy has redefined standards in patient recovery, postoperative complications, cosmetic results, and hospital efficiency.


Objective
To perform a comprehensive comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for three commonly performed abdominal procedures cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal hernia repair focusing on clinical, operative, and patient-centered outcomes.


Methods
A review of more than 30 peer-reviewed studies was conducted to evaluate key surgical parameters, including operative duration, postoperative complications, infection rates, hospital stay, cost-effectiveness, and overall patient satisfaction. Both laparoscopic and open techniques were compared across multiple metrics and clinical scenarios, including uncomplicated and complex cases.


Results
Findings indicate that laparoscopic surgery, characterized by small incisions, trocar use, and camera-guided visualization, offers distinct advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, faster recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes. Open surgery, though more invasive, remains indispensable in complex or emergency cases and in resource-limited settings


Conclusion
Laparoscopic surgery demonstrates superior outcomes for uncomplicated abdominal procedures, yet open surgery continues to hold relevance when patient complexity or limited resources constrain the use of laparoscopy. With ongoing advancements in surgical education, technology, and accessibility, laparoscopy is poised to become the preferred approach for most abdominal operations. This comparative analysis provides evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical decision-making and optimize patient care.

Article Details

Section
Articles